Comparing SGLD and a fixed-noise predictor-corrector adaptation in canonical joint energy-based models on CIFAR-10

comparing-sgld-and-a-fixed-noise-predictor-corrector-adaptation-in-canonical-joint-energy-based-models-on-cifar-10

Comparing SGLD and a fixed-noise predictor-corrector adaptation in canonical joint energy-based models on CIFAR-10

[Submitted on 5 Aug 2026 (v1), last revised 14 Oct 2026 (this version, v3)]

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Joint Energy-Based Models (JEM) unify classification and generation within a single network and support out-of-distribution (OOD) detection. Canonical JEM training relies on stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics (SGLD); a theoretically motivated alternative, the Predictor-Corrector (PC) sampler, has not previously undergone a systematic replication test on the canonical model. We reproduce canonical JEM on WideResNet-28-10 without normalisation layers on two independent runs and test a fixed-noise PC adaptation – with the degenerate annealed-noise predictor replaced by a deterministic gradient step – across three protocols: the adapted sampler replacing SGLD throughout the full training trajectories (115-132 epochs); cold-start generation (FID); and refinement-style multi-OOD detection (AUROC). The reconstruction reaches 92.88% test accuracy and buffer-FID 44.46 (canonical: 92.90% and 38.40). We document two failure modes: catastrophic late-training divergence with the signature of the canonical outlier-buffer mechanism (all four runs), and run-dependent SVHN OOD-discrimination dynamics. No consistent method-level advantage of the adaptation over SGLD is observed on any protocol: refinement AUROC differences stay below 0.007 across ten checkpoint-OOD pairs; seeded cold-start generation favours SGLD by about five FID points; on the training protocol a hierarchical seed-by-image bootstrap gives a 95% confidence interval on the macro-averaged AUROC difference that contains zero, while a seed-level equivalence test with two runs per method cannot establish formal equivalence. The training-protocol data are consistent both with equivalence and with a small directional effect. This outcome is consistent with theory: the guarantees of the annealed-noise PC framework do not transfer to the constant-noise regime of canonical JEM.

Submission history

From: Dmytro Knopov [view email]
[v1] Wed, 5 Aug 2026 16:28:57 UTC (1,743 KB)
[v2] Tue, 11 Aug 2026 09:27:21 UTC (1,747 KB)
[v3] Wed, 14 Oct 2026 11:51:50 UTC (1,750 KB)