[Submitted on 2 Sep 2026 (v1), last revised 19 Oct 2026 (this version, v2)]
Authors:Seunghan Lee, Jun Seo, Jaehoon Lee, Junhyeok Kang, Sangjun Han, Sungdong Yoo, Minjae Kim, Tae Yoon Lim, Dongwan Kang, Hwanil Choi, Soonyoung Lee, Wonbin Ahn
Abstract:Language models used in financial backtests suffer from look-ahead bias, as a model trained on text published after the study period has already observed the outcomes it is asked to predict. To handle this issue, point-in-time (PIT) language models are pretrained on chronologically filtered corpora and released as one checkpoint per calendar year, each with a documented cutoff. However, each additional year costs another pretraining run, and whether that run is necessary has never been tested. In this paper, we show that a newer checkpoint is not detectably better on the decision it informs, as its information coefficient on a fixed evaluation window shows no decay with age that we can detect. Motivated by this observation, we propose PALM (Point-in-time Adaptation for financial Language Models), a simple yet effective alternative to annual pretraining that fits a low-rank adapter on financial text the checkpoint is allowed to read, without modifying any pretrained weight. We further find that the gain comes from the financial domain rather than from recency, which leaves the point-in-time constraint without a detectable cost. We validate PALM on a decade of financial news and on three families of PIT models, whose cutoffs span two decades. The pooled gain keeps its sign across experimental settings and comes at a small fraction of the cost of pretraining. Code is available at: this https URL.
Submission history
From: Seunghan Lee [view email]
[v1] Wed, 2 Sep 2026 08:46:58 UTC (184 KB)
[v2] Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:06:32 UTC (211 KB)
